Students’ Mathematical Thinking in Non-routine Mathematical Problems
Keywords:
non-routine, mathematical thingkingAbstract
The goal of this study was to determine the mathematical thinking process of students in class VIII at SMP 3 Bengkulu City when solving non-routine math problems based on Pythagorean theorem material. The research method used in this study is qualitative field research. In the diagnostic tests that have been administered to students, the percentage of data obtained by high-ability students totaling 3 students is 14 percent, students with moderate abilities totaling 7 students are 33 percent, and 11 students with low ability are 53 percent. According to Mason, the flow of the mathematical thinking process by each research subject varies depending on the form of the problem based on the facts presented. Students include the entry, attack, and review phases in problem number one for high school students. Students cover the attack and review phases for moderate students. Students do not meet the phase in the thinking process that students have in low students. Students complete the entry and attack phases in problem number 2 for high school students. Students cover the entry and attack phases for moderate students. Students cover the entry phase for low students.
References
Astriyani, A. (2019). Analisis Proses Berpikir Matematis Peserta Didik Dalam Menyelesaikan Aplikasi Turunan. Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE), 5(2), 137.
C. Arslan., & M. A. (2017). Learning to solve non-routine mathematical problems. İlköğretim Online, 6(1), 50–61.
D. Ariskari, et al. (2019). Pengembangan Modull Matematika Berbasis Problem solving pada materi vector. Desimal Jurnal Matematika, 2(3), 250.
J.Miraglia, L., J King, F., & D. R. (2011). Seeing The Light : Lumenisecent Reporter Gene Assays. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, 14(8), 648–657.
Kinard, J. (2017). Method And Apparatus For Creating Rigorous Mathematical Thingking.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2011). Thinking Mathematically Second Edition. Pearson Education Limited.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & S. K. (2010). Thinking Mathematically. Second Edition. Addison Wesley.
Mason. J, et al. (2010). Thingking Mathematically: second edition. Pearson Education.
Mulyati, T. (2016). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Eduhumaniora Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru., 3(2), 5–6.
N. Islamiah et al. (2018). Analisis Hubungan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Self Confidence Siswa SMP. Journal on Education, 1(1), 47–57.
NCTM. (2000). Curriculum and Evaluation Standard For School Mathematics. VA:NCTM.
Ni’mah, F. I. F. and K. (2020). Deskripsi Proses Berpikir Matematis Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Konsep Barisan Berdasarkan Teori Mason. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 6(2), 713–714.
P. M. Farib, et al. (2019). Proses berfikir kritis matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama melalui discovery learning. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 99–117.
Pasandaran., R. F. (2019). Representasi dalam penyelesaian masalah non rutin. Guru Tua : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 46.
Setiawan., S. M. A. & R. (2018). Analisis Penggunaan Strategi Menerka Lalu Menguji Kembali dan Melihat dari Sudut Pandang Lain Dalam Matematika Non-Rutin Untuk Penyelesaian Mencari Nilai x Pada Suatu Persamaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika SOLUSI, 2(1), 64.
Sgela., L. (2014). Efektifitas Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistic Indonesia (PMRI) Untuk Peningkatan Kemampuan Berfikir Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Derivat, 1(2), 2.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif ,Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sumarno, U. (2010). Berikir dan Disposisi Matematika : Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana dikembangkan pada peserta didik. FMIPA UPI.
Supardi, U. S. (2015). Peran Berpikir Kreatif dalam Proses Pembelajaran Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 2(3), 249.
Widyastuti., R. (2015). Proses Berpikir Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Teori Polya Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient Tipe Climber. Al-Jabar:Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 183.
Winarni, E. W. (2018). Teori dan praktik Penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif, PTK, R & D. Bumi Aksara.